Denied 073 Removal campaign part 3

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Either replace 073 with 131 a and b or completely remove 073 all together

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, I have completed parts 1 and 2, and I suggest replacing the SCP job with a job that can be utilized against 173 if they wish to transfer it from containment.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Add more realism as 073 and 076 are not suppose to be in the same site
- No more getting killed by 073 because he wanted to get Infront of you while shooting you
- Add RP
- A Unique way into recontaining 173
- Some new for the server
-Give researcher a new SCP to test on.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
-Nothing

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Over the years, 073 has been a constant source of trouble on the server. The SCP was never used for RP; it was used to annoy people and fail at RP massively. 073 is a hazard for combat as it takes a couple of movements to kill an entire group of foundation because they shot 073. Never have I once seen a place RP with 073, and I doubt there will be in the future. It also doesn't make sense to have 073 and 076 in the same site, as it was proven that they together cause more damage and make it harder to kill 076 lore wise. whitelisting 073 would be counterproductive because who would make an application for a shitty SCP that no one would listen to? You will essentially make the class more dull than it already is. This is proven by 22415, as on the US side, it is scarce for someone to get on the SCP, probably because it can only send people into the shadow dimension and push SCPs or heal people, but not engage in combat, and CI cannot work with the SCP either, as the SCP deems them the bad guys.

Overall, 073 has zero purpose on the server, and I believe it is necessary to replace him with 131 a/b for three reasons
1. It's something new for the server and can add more RP
2. can be used against 173 if they want to move it to a different place.
3 Combatants won't have to worry about killing themselves over an SCP that reflects the damage they inflict on it

Hopefully, this gets accepted, and if worst comes to worst, they deny it, then at least provide a better reason than simply stating, "We will not be removing any SCP from the server as it is unnecessary." How is it unnecessary if you're removing an SCP model (which is 21.900 MB according to the workshop) and swep (that has 1.116 KB) that can reduce lag on the server and Replacing it with another SCP's model (which is 6.388 MB) and doesn't need a swep.

Here is a cool workshop I found for 131 a/b that has 860 and 999 models as well, but they are the same model
1751559309218.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Puma 'Providence'

James Dingle

Administrator
Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Jul 13, 2024
177
69
41
Suggestion Denied



Hi @Evil ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

Content Team would not be looking to remove SCP-073 at this current moment in time. We have recently accepted a suggestion about making SCP-073 easier to re-contain, found here, which aims to reduce some of the frustration that players have displayed with SCP-073.

If you have any further suggestions on specific changes for SCP-073 outside of it's removal, please feel free to make another suggestion and Content Team would happily discuss it.

SCP-131 instances are also not something that we would look to add to the server as a main stay, however if you are interested in seeing these more please reach out to the GM team as they have ran at least one event involving these SCPs.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.