+/-Neutral
Can't say I've seen you around. Probably due to the timezone difference.
Well put together application though. Best of luck with your application.
+Support
ERT should be powerful against 173 but not as powerful as they are now. This is a good balance, If a ERT tries to solo 173 they get punished, if they are not solo then no difference is made really.
I'd love for ISD CL4 to be able to do tribunals again. Same thing goes with other CL4's.
A while ago on US that was the case and we got daily tribunals basically. And despite them being hosted by Jr CL4 ISD, the outcomes were fair and reasonable as it was a uninvolved CL4 ISD. That was the...
-Support
While in some situations it could be seen as reasonable to point out a persons rule break this almost never changes behavior. I also worry about unintended side effects, like D-Class screaming RDM the second they get shot once. Or other abuse.
+Support
966 is very weak, and the current implementation has nothing to do with what 966 does other than invisibility.
This would make breaching as 966 fun.
+/- Neutral
I am opposed to complete removal as this post suggests. Although adjustment to allow more room for certain acts of violence that would be reasonable is fine.
This makes remote secure comms impossible. While that can make RP more interesting, It could also be really annoying.
If we had pagers for the phones and they had a easy way to verify identity I'd be for it as that provides a alternative. But with how the current system is, there's no...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.