Rule Suggestion Make Nu-7 LTs great again

[Lonix]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add ability for MTF Nu-7 LT (not all MTF LTs) to auth a raid on a hostile GOI brining it in line with DEA Sp agent and other GOIs LTs.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
- I don't believe so.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
During hours when higher CoC are absent, Nu-7 can still auth raids against GOIs and creates more surface activity.
Nu-7’s presence is heavily tied to surface control. Allowing Lieutenants to authorize raids ensures hostile threats can be countered swiftly, maintaining surface security.
A way to prevent enemy GOIs from raiding or stalling them if they have lost their raiding equipment.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
More raids?
I cant see any for me.
Based on the Positives &; Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
If DEA Sp agent can i believe Nu7 LT also should be able to.

 

[Glazzing]

+support make it a jr cl4 too!!

 

[GameRush_cz]

I'd say ask the Nu7 CO teams.
If they agree this should go foward, if they dont it shouldnt.
Depends on if they trust their LTs.

 

[JasonTheCheesyGuy]

I'd say ask the Nu7 CO teams.
If they agree this should go foward, if they dont it shouldnt.
Depends on if they trust their LTs.

If it is determined by the CO teams, it should be a regulation recorded within regiment-specific documentation rather than in the rulebook, as the former has significantly more flexibility so that the CO team can change it at will.

+Support for that reason, really. Let the CO's decide it after that.

 

[Scopes]

What is the big deal? If you don't trust your LT don't put them in that position, Simple.

+Support

 

[Emilia Foddg]

If it is determined by the CO teams, it should be a regulation recorded within regiment-specific documentation rather than in the rulebook, as the former has significantly more flexibility so that the CO team can change it at will.

+Support for that reason, really. Let the CO's decide it after that.

Full agree - The server rules shouldn't prevent it, it's better that it be something determined by IC policy. If IC policy ends up being damaging, then it can be reviewed to see if it needs to be restricted again.