Search results

What about people who dog leave

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Gives Combat Medics bodycams on spawn, like most other combatives. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Possibly, though maybe not this specific. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2)...

There are two open slots, so it's entirely possible for it to be Remmy plus one of the Commissioners that have applied.

He was ECC and O5-1, both of which work extremely closely with ISD leadership, and one of which literally selects ISD Directors, in what way has he not "worked closer with the department"??

I would hope that DoIA and maybe Ambassador would count towards that

Wait, doesn't that imply that they're already calling it out with metagaming?

This is an awful idea. ISD can arrest AO, and AO don't oversee ISD in any way, this doesn't make any sense. If you need something from ISD comms, your SC can already access it.

+Support I do agree with some of the points raised in your application. Though all of the current CL4s that are active seem to have been doing a decent job in things like investigations and arrests, things have felt a little bit like they're without direction, and the department policies are a...

I would hope that CT would at least consider it, though either way, I just don't like combat chems. Chems should be roleplay-focused, not "Speed boost. And another. And regen. And healing a huge amount at once. And jump boost. Fuck you."

I'd honestly rather combat chems not really be a thing. If a chem gives a combat advantage, it should also give a disadvantage, e.g. potent duloxetine shouldn't just give you a huge speed boost, 682 shouldn't give you perma regen with no disadvantage, etc. An overdose functionality would be...

+Support Application looks decent, I know you're active, and you seem decent at roleplay from what I've seen. Would be cool to get a DEA GM, too.

I am fully willing to take and accept criticism, which you can see from various points in the thread, e.g. my responses to Remmy, Ryan and RedMann, it's just a lot of the criticism given here I do dispute for a few different reasons, e.g. Kayla's criticism of me due to things somebody else did...

Could you be more specific as to what you mean by "current state"? Is it purely due to this thread? Because the main point of me replying is to either acknowledge or refute points brought up, and I'm not sure how that couldn't be considered "arguing" - I'm fairly sure that's just how normal...

On UK, there's a dispenser in the area between SOP and E&TS, and a dispenser at the bottom of the escalators opposite EOC.

You can just ask SA+ to move it, though they might need your Site Admin to sign off on it

I'm a bit confused at what you mean here, I can't lie. I've been spending a roughly equal amount of time purely on Tech Expert and Investigator over the past month - I haven't been on Thaumatologist in over a month. On Tech Expert, I've been interacting with GSD, ISD, E-11, SA and other E&TS...

Part of what I'd want to be doing is just listening to what different departments and the like actually want and trying different things to help them out, but I do have some specific ideas that I'd want to trial, such as: The Senior Engineer Programme idea, which I've already brought to current...

Honestly, as far as your ISD performance goes, you've been great as a Commissioner as far as I can tell, and I wouldn't particularly have an issue with you being Director. My main issue has just been the questionable discussions and the like in TeamSpeak, especially late night, which I don't...

I do try to change my views based on other arguments/evidence generally, there's just been a fair few things on CN where I just have some opinions on things like E&TS where so far I haven't been convinced, and in the past that has ended up with things like arguments where I'm not changing my...

I played on USA for like... a week or two?