Search results

  1. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied D-class + D-block QOL changes

    The UNGOC jugg was 1 time xD And a few months ago at that
  2. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Content Suggestion The Return of the SCP 966 Changes discussion

    Seeing as total invisibility is unpopular, post will be edited shortly
  3. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Content Suggestion The Return of the SCP 966 Changes discussion

    Legit tho! I one time was carefully going past HCZ Primary after being silently breached by 079, avoided E11 and went around in the longest way possible. And I still got called out because "What the?? I hear 966s breathing! Check his box" And I'll add your Stalk idea
  4. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Content Suggestion The Return of the SCP 966 Changes discussion

    @Emilia Foddg Get in here, I lowkey wanna see your take
  5. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Content Suggestion The Return of the SCP 966 Changes discussion

    -What does this Add/Change/Remove?- This suggestion covers several ideas I have had on how 966 could be made more intresting to play as. -Why he needs them?- SCP-966 is honestly not that great of an SCP. He is meant to be a stealthy, sneaky hunter going around ambushing players. However it is...
  6. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Content Meeting Discussion Feedback Thread: Maximum amount of armor obtainable Change.

    While I'm not a member of the GOC anymore. I still feel as though their Ambassadors should be able to have 100 armour just like Foundation Cl5s. Considering that they would be a priority target, especially with their model sticking out like a sore thumb compared to the other GOCs. And, this is...
  7. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied Attachment Freedom

    Peak suggestion (It is going to get denied instantly)
  8. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Accepted [UK] The O5 Council Member's Signature

    Why would this just be a UK addition?
  9. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Accepted Nu-7 Juggernaut | Radio Preset

    Stasis suggestion detected. Opinion rejected
  10. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied Replace The Scrap Trader's Burger with a Snubnose

    Nu uh
  11. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied Hot take - Remove SCP 012

    What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion would fully remove SCP 012 and its containment from the server Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: No Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): More available map brush...
  12. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied SCP 'Press F2 to Escape and Claim rewards!' change

    Is that allowed?
  13. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied SCP 'Press F2 to Escape and Claim rewards!' change

    Withdrawn. I wish to remake this suggestion entirely after the change log
  14. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied SCP 'Press F2 to Escape and Claim rewards!' change

    Dang
  15. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied SCP 'Press F2 to Escape and Claim rewards!' change

    Bro I legit searched the F2 term and that didn't show up xD
  16. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied SCP 'Press F2 to Escape and Claim rewards!' change

    What does this Suggestion Add/Change/Remove? This suggestion would change the way that SCPs can Press F2 to immediately end their breach (As it's one of the most common ways I see surface breached SCPs die). I see a few different ways this could happen. 1: F2 Automatically gives a large amount...
  17. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Rule Suggestion No raid-involvement post-death.

    By the logic they're using. If I was on DEA and saw /SOP Come to garage to prep for a GOC raid I could immeidately flag onto GOC and swap onto jugg to be wandering around then "finding out" about the raid when it happens
  18. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Rule Suggestion No raid-involvement post-death.

    I'm shocked that it isn't job abuse Tbh
  19. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Denied CI DC Warfunds

    You should probably edit your suggestion to include the bio restirctions Like (Max cl3 Biometrics included)
  20. UNGOC Starfox / Walter

    Rule Suggestion No raid-involvement post-death.

    That's job abuse Btw
Top Bottom
Back