Search results

In addition, you may wish to review the Loadout Suggestions and Balancing section of the FaQ; Detailing why it is likely going to be denied since "I don't like the gunplay" is the primary reason behind the suggestion. Additionally, I do not see "To fight GOIs and SCPs" as a well thought out...

-Support. Omega-1 personnel, especially it's commander, should not be combating SCPs nor GOIs. You primary goals are to ensure the safety of the Ethics Committee, and to enforce the Code of Ethics. The Mk8 is an Ethics violation if used against D-Class personnel, which is your most common...

These are incredibly one-sided counter suggestions and are not conducive to server health. Have a bulkhead closed "80% of the time" or having "80% of MTF camp SCP containments" are not fun for anyone involved, and stimulate 0 roleplay. Additionally, I believe no MTF would want to sit at SCP-079...

Completely forgot, thank you so much

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held: S.C.P-096[US] (Holding) D.E.A Sr. Agent[US] (Holding) G.O.C Corporal[UK] (Held) Nu-7 Lance Corporal[UK] (Held) G.O.C Lieutenant[US] (Held) G.O.C Lance Corporal[UK] (Held) E-11 Lance Corporal[UK] (Held) Nu-7 Specialist[US] (Held)...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Makes a rule clarification that disallows Internal Affairs from blatantly ignoring CoE, CoC, or Legal Codex violations, such as turning around while someone is murdered, or allowing GENSEC to kill Class-D personnel without warning. Has something...

+ Support Gonna be denied like the removal of snipers because the content team / people who make the decisions are out of touch. Again. Or if it is accepted, it'll take well over a year to implement or finalize because its not something they prioritize. Like most suggestions on here.

+Support But it'll be denied cuz it doesn't make money and its content for GOIs and not exclusively Foundation or premium content. Lol

Is there anywhere specific we can post our comments? or just here? Cuz I think yall need to delete snipers or add ceramic plates as something people can get, either from AA or from warfunds.

delete them????? wont balance them with ceramic plates or any other feature thats already made on milRP on god

I'm not going to debate with you further since you are just ignoring each and every statementjust to make it seem as though a rule suggestion that simulates RP does the opposite and 'nullifies' the CoC/CoE by existing, which is just ridiculous. If you can't understand that the RP scenario ends...

The entire purpose of this rule clarification would not outright prevent Civs from being killed, but would specify unarmed, non-hostile civs are not to be KOS'd until an appropriate RP reason presents itself. The Foundation DOES protect civilians, hence the name Secure. Contain. Protect...

Cope. Honestly a krill issue. GOC is like 80% worse then CI and 50% worse then Foundation. We get airstrikes & shitter weapons then CI do. Teaming with CI is RP related, and can easily flip to complete hostilities / war, same as Foundation. DEA / Nu7 get better versions of our classes...

+Support Please god. Remove the rank / prefix for Assessment Teams and Deep Covers, its so obvious and easy to meta game with. All someone has to do is look at your name and ask for an ID or code-word check you and its jover.

+Support Polish fr

So the issue currently, and prior, is that Parawatch are discouraged from RPing as SOP doesnt really do much on surface, and as a result getting a valid RP reason to enter the site is very difficult. This leads to people simply breaking rules to have a little fun as parawatch or similar. Though...

The few times Ive tried conducting actual parawatch RP, with documents, conspiracy development, etc., all ended when I entered the site and got spotted by any MTF personnel, in which I am immediately killed. Ive been interrogated a whopping one time, and it was conducted so poorly I can...

As I stated in my suggestion, this rule would not apply to civilians with guns drawn, either on safety or aimed. Most of your points seem to come from an agitated state, which I dont blame you for, but generally speaking this rule would encourage more genuine, active roleplay from both sides...

The entire purpose of the Foundation is to protect civilians, and your character, even in the Foundation, shouldnt be willingly killing civilians on-sight just because its a classified area. If someone is obviously failRPing, that doesn't make this rule any more or less valid, nor does it...

Civilians who are wielding guns would be exempt from this rule as they are intentionally being combative; Additionally, the only near-pear equipment that can be acquired by any allowed surface job to enter site is that of MC&D, who is incapable of selling said equipment to Rangers or Parawatch...