Search results

I like it. Although that one guys idea of "DCs breaching to cause a distraction" is actually not a bad reason. But yeah otherwise DCs breaching is stupid and bad for RP.

I want to make people aware here what the bodycam change was written as: to: I do think the original list is perhaps a bit big such as: O5/EC? All CL4? All GOC/CI? All GENSEC? All MTF? But I do think the secondary list is missing a fair few, with some of my personal ones really being the...

Damn. Hear me out so I can cope - Zen's said "within SRA range" mine says "within SRA visible range" which could be perceived as much smaller and therefore as less of a problem (and should be frankly - the size of a regular TB being affected by the SRA range is reasonably large).

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make it so Reality Benders are unable to use their reality bending powers on people who are stood within the visible range of the Scranton Reality Anchors. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different...

The biggest issue is that the steam ID does not actually show the persons name / steam when they printed it. A CI could print something, and if they flag onto Foundation it will be the same document / steam ID, or a person on 1 Foundation character could be arrested for the printing of a...

Crazy Car Insurance Interest The definitions and reasonings behind a group IC should not be the only thing considered when balancing them for a fun experience out of character.

- Support ERT is meant to act as a stop blocker to breaches that last too long or are too powerful. It would be interesting for 173 to be changed to be more effective against ERT, but it should also be weakened against others.

This guy is not real

Yes. And as much as some people don't want to admit it, ruleplay is a necessary tool in balancing fun and the creation of RP. Without ruleplay CI could always raid, or SCPs could choose to never interact with RP / tests, or a dozen other negatives of things that are not quite FailRP (the main...

I like this. Upwards support.

Neuro Controllers would very likely make people like E-11, SA, SC, etc feel safer around a passively breached SCP (and feel safer authorising it). However SCPs can already passive breach, SCP-049 can already show his surgery and do surgery with medical, SCP-035 can be allowed to walk around and...

I like this guy, very cool (y)

Lore Approved Hello @Holy Doggo(Bruno Leopold) Your Lore Request has been approved. Any changes to your Character Bio will have to go through the process of being accepted again. Kind regards, Blob :)

It's good, I like it (y)

Currently I'm against this, the current issue is that you cannot inject yourself so drinking the chem comes as the only mechanical move. If there was a "self injection syringe" that could be gotten easily and only be used for self injection then I think this would be a very cool suggestion and...

I cannot say this for sure as I'm not Cade, but I think this was his entire point? That currently people bring tons of chems for those single 1 off moments instead of planning ahead and considering what they may need.

I like the idea if loss but not of other players gaining, I think that would cause larger problems to be honest. Am I right to assume your suggestion means the first few X millilitres of chems would be safe (e.g first 1L of potent, or first 100ml of Anima wouldn't be lost or taken) and then...

Thaumatologist is already a role within the Research department, you said it yourself - the reason the suggestion was made was to allow higher rank researchers (CL4s) play as a thaumatologist without changing their RP character / randomly being deranked. It doesn't make sense to have other CL4...

The majority of these seem fairly simple to me, I'll go through the ones that fulfil that to me: First List: 1. FailRP - You cannot teleport an item into someone elses pocket, it simply doesn't make sense in RP, so you cannot do that during an active RP scenario. 3. FailRP - As it is a raid to...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The following is the spawn camping rule: This suggestion is to add an addition to this rule that also classifies spawn camping as Now this wording probably is not perfect, so I would find it completely reasonable to have it changed but the general...