because they're supposed to be completely disallowed however USA SL just seemed to auth it for little to no justification just because they cant be fucked to deal with the constant WEHWEHWEH GIVE ME DIS if told no
+Support
Scrippy needs an entire overhaul TBH even the departments who rely on documents and storing mass docs next to refuses to use it but this would be a solid start
CM's aren't allowed on surface without auth because of how much nu-7 / DEA got upset when they did get involved if you guys want CM's to be more nu-7/DEA "interactive" then approach us about it instead of being so against interacting with other departments / regiments
something that'd make this an actual applicable addition would be if E-11 could only spawn in garage during code blacks (as in the option would only appear during them) but could also cause balance issues
the way i plan to structure this role within Medical boundaries is they only get involved with code 5's or code 1's
there is obviously scenarios i cant consider for nor can i really tell them to not detain random D-Class they see within LCZ but yea they shouldnt be involved with dblock at all
so i did attempt / think out both of your arguments
Dual loadouts wont be intended on being added to anyone else, On top of that a dual loadout for one job alone isn't worth the amount of effort it takes for them to implement it
in terms of semi whitelist i do agree with it however I've been...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion, if accepted would be to create a new role for Medical where it would be a "Semi-Combative" Combat medic focused on backline support instead of just being another gun to involve in gunfights. This will obviously be hard to enforce as...
if u ask me 939 shouldn't require going to a flare shot its just people being lazy n wanting free samples from it lmao. aside of that you would think something that majorly overloads his senses would yknow make him avoid the flare not go to it and be like OH GEE NOTHING ELSE IN THE WORLD MATTERS...
Application Denied
Hi Aitor,
I have chosen to deny you myself due to the fact you have applied for the position of consultant 3 or 4 times within the past month alone whilst not even showing any improvements to your application and have ignored our application cooldown requests.
I wish you...
+/- Neutral (but could be convinced for support)
i feel like this could be a well balanced addition tbh as breaching another SCP does take a succulent second to fully do so if you go to breach someone you're essentially leaving an open window for someone to recontain you.
on the other hand SCP...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.