Search results

remind me what the name of CI is unabbreviated?

no, but saying dc's cant breach scps without kidnapping them is ruleplay

holy ruleplay -support

there is nothing interesting about being stunned with no counterplay, if you really need to crutch a stun gun to win, your just fucking bad at the game

valid

name some rp you have done that cant be considered slop?

please censor that word

"j*b" -support

this is something dc's should be already be able to do but cant sadly, good idea though!

make it use the personnel tablet!!

"Those who spawn with a Tranq cant use it during combat, but those who acquire by other means can" simple fix brah

-support "job" all i need to hear

AEK is objectively worse than the AS VAL the AS VAL is good, whilst damage is on the low side it makes up for it with 0 recoil and high fire rate. To all those saying it isn't maybe get better at the game?? -support

you know what else is a major counter to ci tb, the actual intended counter!! scrantons!!! woah!!!!!

not very healthy as theres literally no way to counter it apart from sitting like a duck and hoping you dont get pushed

you can do this currently aslong as you have a cl3, just dont give techies the vjobeditor flag to use cams then

a base update would be nice, current base is really poor as there isnt much space for anything and its shittingly awful to attack. Just something different from the 4-way intersection currently going on

+support bunch of negative nancys over here

ic policies could probably do something about this if implemented

"im too lazy to fight a raid and im gonna whine about its consequences on the forums!" surface combat for F and CI is more than engaging enough, contesting surface = very little raids shouldnt punish a group of players simply because they are more skilled