Search results

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Engallagher K. Ludenberg Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Toaste Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Harvey Bridger Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

It's so Grover. o7

+Support Little QOL change that wouldn't actually be too hard to implement I believe?

+Support More dimensional counterplay, please!

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Zen Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment request...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Harvey Bridger Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @(Calvin Lucien) Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

+Support An actual passive way and a reason to not hate reality bending? Sounds based to me.

They'll deny this because "we don't trust the players not to call it in every breach" mentality. Which while valid can still be a massive pain in the arse. I'm trusted to blow the site up but god forbid I take options to avoid that...

+Support

+support Small quality of life change. Why not?

-support Not really needed, wouldn't add anything special aside from increasing the immersion on the surface. The majority of the players are inside buildings/bunkers/compounds anyway.

-Support, the exact reason stated by Pyro.

+Support I like this idea a lot. I am not a fan of the dimensional update due to the fact it has one of the most limiting counter plays out of the entire gameplay loop of the server; me waiting 15 minutes to deploy another scranton which won't even kick the dude out of the dimension unless...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @(Calvin Lucien) Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Archangel Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Maksim "Enigma" Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @François "Napoléon" Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role...