Search results

Infect the entirety of surface! A new system that works with existing systems and RP structures to create new RP with decreased reliance on RNG mechanics feels like a good idea. No immediate issues come to mind other than the obvious potential difficulty of actually implementing it, but to me...

Add the RPG-7 to Cadet loadout and let them use it in D-Block.

I don't disagree. My point is that is kinda feels exploity and not within the spirit of what is intended here; I said that it should and will likely stay until a suitable replacement that maintains said advantage without being so... I guess, wrong? Like, it does not make sense in a firefight to...

Monkey's paw curls. Nu7 now have water tanks. You're welcome.

+Support Good. One minor thing I would say: I know this is implied, but since you do like explicit wording in your rules, I would suggest something like which adds further clarity and nips in the bud a minge potentially attempting to get around the rule by pedantry and pass off FailRP as...

Deleted Member 128 is based.

This discourse is wild imo - While I agree that Foundation should have advantage in their own base on surface, the windows are clearly providing an unfair advantage that is not in the correct gameplay spirit. As a result, I would say leaving it as is for now is unfortunately probably the best...

Honestly IMO, even if it was just that specific area where interro used to be, cutting into medbay and d-block a little, that whole area is deserving of adjustments. It feels a little awkward to just have this weird upper walkway above medbay entrance with no real purpose other than to...

-Support As Zen & Naffen said, this sort of thing has been previously discussed in a past, partially-accepted suggestion - As someone who participated in that prior discussion, during such we covered all necessary and important points that IMO, in conjunction made that idea relatively airtight...

096 nerf 😭 It makes sense, though. +Support

+Support What the fluoride?

+Support Little else aught be said.

Hi - Speaking from personal experience, Staff are exceptionally peerless when it comes to quashing power abuse by GMs, at least on UK. But as I can't speak for US, I can potentially understand this being a concern there. Power abuse is otherwise taken extremely seriously by the Staff team. +/-...

I vaguely recall this being suggested and accepted before. +Support

...So the entire suggestion is bad because you don't particularly trust the idea of giving this to E&TS jobs, when the suggestion is clearly about more than just that? That seems overly harsh.

A highly interesting and compelling idea - A flexible & modular system like this would have potential benefits across the board, expanding possibilities for normal RP while also being a potentially powerful tool in the GM toolkit - In terms of normal role usage, I can see this possibly being...

+/- Neutral, Leaning -Support + Active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + A Creative & responsible individual, is very good GM material, IMO. - Map change event is not a map change event (Not that this question should even still be in the app, IMO, but) - App is...

+Support I see we're digging this old argument up again. Alright, let's see where it goes. I don't think the position will budge from the last time, but whatever. Highly doubt that they're convincible of this. All the good arguments have already been given and they've basically just been refuted...

I think one of the primary issues with it is that his standard attack appears identical to how sampling does, so I think it might cause confusion on that part.

IIRC he has (or at the very least, used to have) a busen burner in his CC. Was mostly for decoration, though, honestly. However, in terms of 'full access,' you didn't touch the topic of sampling. I'd assume 049 should not be able to sample anything as that would have several issues.