Search results

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion seeks any or all of the following: Minimum clearance to dispense Bodycam: CL1 -> CL0 The necessary adjustments required to allow the following SCPs to equip bodycams: 073 22415 (All 3) 8837 Has something similar been...

...I see we're having this discussion again. I've seen the arguments on both sides, stated my support for the revision of this in past suggestions and my stance is unchanged. I really don't think the correct way to fundamentally crack down on minging on a role is to lock down its roleplay with...

+Support For return of being able to do cognitohazards, and +Major Support For 079 being able to mess with keycard printers. I know that the immediate thing that'll be seen with this is abuse - However let's evaluate that thoroughly: The keycard printers themselves are locked away in the SA...

Make the entire playermodel a bodycamera. +Support

+Major Support Didn't realise this wasn't possible. This just makes sense. Part and parcel of the reason we have keycard storage is to mitigate lag from having piles of keycards just sitting around on the floor. Doesn't really work if you can't put your own faction's keycards in your own boxes...

+Support I like the premise. I personally like the idea that a CI DC could surreptitiously steal an inanimate SCP which would only later be discovered by a researcher attempting to test on it and finding that it's just gone. That sounds fun. You could reword this as an 'Inanimate SCPs Rework'...

Hm. Problem being that we might end up with another documents guy - The entire reason VComputers documents have a decay timer when dropped is because someone spammed a bunch of them and caused server lag in the past. And the thing is, this is more likely to happen with this kind of thing for...

Oh, right. Yeah, no, this is better restricted mechanically. ...Which of course would in all likelihood, mean developing a custom addon for altering bodygroups in a prescribed way, with no room for abuse. Which sounds like pain, and I don't envy the person who'd take on implementing that. Hm...

+Support Honestly, yeah. IMO, everything to do with vehicles is deserving of a rework to some extent as there's just so much wrong with that mess as a whole - For the time being, this specific thing kinda just generally makes sense; There are some existing safeguards against server...

😶

D-Class need buffs, not nerfs. D-Class gameplay is impossible. I counter your suggestion with an infinitely better one: Add Nerve Gas to the D-Class loadout. -Support

+Support +/- Neutral following later discussion This will never be accepted due to PAC being part of the server's financial model. Honestly, a happy medium would be a VPoints package for this - For people that don't really care as much about the granular capabilities that PAC offers and just...

Oh, right - I put something like this forward in the past, albeit that was more aimed at solving the whole "If regimental COs need to be on a lower rank job because Officer slots are full and want to do CL4 stuff, they mostly can't - But it is planned for them to be able to be CL4 if they have...

"Assert dominance over other roleplayers by referring to them by their SteamID" Ahhh :skull:

How about a pre-defined groups of somewhat vague descriptive identifiers per job subset, that people get randomly assigned when they switch to one of these jobs for the first time in that session? So for D-Class it could be stuff like "Rambunctious D-Class, Scruffy, D-Class, Rowdy D-Class,"...

+Support "Hello my good friend O5-1 'The Crustacean', how has your Day been Breaking? I hear the 008 zombie virus special in the cafeteria today is to die for!"

Why do you want to add missing attachments, anyway? Aren't attachments supposed to help you hit things? Then again, the idea of a loudener is a fun one - Su, sure.

Yes - But they're talking about having it as part of a back-and-forth with someone in a completely different room.

+Major Support Stripping changes are sensible. Keycard changes feel a liiittle lofty? They make sense on the surface, but part of me wonders if this is worthwhile implementation-wise and what the particular purpose of allowing someone to hold multiple of the same clearance keycard would serve...

Prophesised return of Email Ford. Provisionally. I plan on appearing on the server here and there from time to time. Will likely be maining 096 for the time being and getting my bearings on what everything's like, how the landscape has changed after 7 months. Will still be hounding suggestions...