Search results

+Support with a cavitate Hello! I have read through this application and I do see a lot of promises which I relatively trust you to work along with , however. I have concerns namely; The fact that I don't see much RP Creation from you for lower rankings. Which while is not entirely expected of...

5 suits used in total all week.

I'll say this. While UK does "Use" the Suits to a degree. It's sparingly. I ( No Offence ) do not trust the US Player base to use such an item as this in situations where it is required. Hell, I have to second guess myself half the time on it's use. I understand that you want it and that it...

I understand that. If I thought it was a big issue I would have made it more apparent.

Hiya, pal! After reading through your application, I have come to conclusion to leave a +Support. Supportive Arguments; Unsupportive Arguments; After all of this, I hope you change the GM Application with my arguments in mind. If you require help/want me to look over your edited...

No offence. This is formatted really weirdly. I agree with most of what you said however both " Edge " & 22415 Dimension have the same strain on the server as each other. Edge would mean you can't Scranton out and HAVE to take the damage.

" Powerful " It does less damage than 2 Freedom shots

1. " Lore " isn't a valid reason to dismiss a complaint about balance. 2. No where in it's description does it mention it being trained by the best of the best. 3. Type-Blues for one aren't SCPs & have much more practical use out of combat. 4. If you want the server to be completely lore...

Then don't use it while holding? It's like how you wouldn't use destabilise if there isn't a scranton. Banishment is not really a defensive spell.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion is asking for the removal of All TB insta-kill abilities & the replacement of others with more Thaumaturge aligned abilities. I will put a list of potential abilities here; Fireball ( Which replaces Ignite ), would be an AOE fire...

Hiya, pal! After reading through your application, I have come to conclusion to leave a +Support. Supportive Arguments; Unsupportive Arguments; After all of this, I hope you change the GM Application with my arguments in mind. If you require help/want me to look over your edited...

Hiya, pal! After reading through your application, I have come to conclusion to leave a -Support. Supportive Arguments; Unsupportive Arguments; After all of this, I hope you change the GM Application with my arguments in mind. If you require help/want me to look over your edited application...

Hiya, pal! After reading through your application, I have come to conclusion to leave a -/+Neutral. Supportive Arguments; Unsupportive Arguments; After all of this, I hope you change the GM Application with my arguments in mind. If you require help/want me to look over your edited...

The deployment time is unable to be changed ( without dev time ) however the cooldown can be.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Reduce 1000lb bomb cooldown to 45 Minutes from 2 Hours & Reduce the cost from $2,000,000 to $1,000,000 Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Not to my knowledge. Possible Positives of the suggestion...

I feel like there should be a set amount like 008. Like 12 MTF on for CI to kidnap SCPs.

+ Support with a condition Personally, I have no issue with falcon. He has always done fairly good RP from my POV. He plays a character well and "Seems" to have overall good intentions for the server. But. Given his blacklist of all CL4+ Roles & Removal from O5 & SL not once but twice. I would...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Allow the UNGOC & CI to be more dynamic with SCPs. CI can keep locked away in cells and do RP with them with a set breach queue, until MTF Retrieve them or server restart. UNGOC can ADB anomalies and make that job locked for a period of time 1 - 2...

o7

Fair enough. I have changed my response to match.