Search results

Suggestion Partially Approved Hi @Checkedsauce7 , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to partially accept your suggestion for the following reasons. We have decided to modify the O5 and OSA keycards respectively to display "Site Inspectorate"...

@Checkedsauce7 To clarify, you wish to change both Alpha-1 and Omega-1 and overseer assistants to say site inspectorate? O5's keycards don't say [REDACTED] on them so I'm confused why that point is being raised.

@DJ-Cgull Can you explain in any detail about the situation and why it was justified besides "It was larp".

Suggestion Denied Hi @Alex 'Sinner' Saint , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. As mentioned by a few users, Security is a major concern with any feature like this, Similar to why QR codes...

Thread has been locked untill O5 decide their verdict and wish to post the response.

This is incorrect. SSL do not get involved in the voting process for site command members aside from -1 or ECC which is picked by them. In the end, it is solely -1 and the current councils decision, SSL are of course free to give their opinions privately to the current council, as are a few...

Appeal Denied Hi @Ign0r3MyLag , Thanks for taking the time to make a ban appeal. After reviewing your ban reason, I will agree death threats does not suit here. As such I will be changing it to "Player targeting | Character Separation", However you still will be remaining banned for the...

When changes are "New" and such they require content, the 914 one was due to 914 being made SCP of the month which content agreed on. Course if they wanted to veto an SCP they could.

Suggestion Approved Hi @500Cigarettes , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. This seems to have been an oversight as this was already the case for select medical jobs on UK. This has been updated on USA to match it. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as...

Suggestion Denied Hi @"Alchemy" | "Gauntlet" , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. While some chat markdown may be considered in the future, The ones suggested are going to cause more...

Hello @Micah Bell Can you explain your relation to this account. https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199472721035 Regards, Merrick.

Appeal Accepted Hi @victorortizp , Thanks for taking the time to make a ban appeal. I've found your steamID and removed the ban, You are now able to play. Do note any chemical theft in the future may result in an increased punishment. Regards, Merrick.

Hello @victorortizp Are you sure you've linked the correct steamID here? This one has no record of being on the server at all.

@samhartley You've been unbanned, Reminder that any instance of you being banned from now will result in the permanent ban being reinstated. Do not disappoint Regards, Merrick.

If you don't break any rules, you aren't likely to be banned. Am I going to be able to trust you won't immediately repeat the same behaviour that lead to your prior perma?

That's not an option here.

Ctrl+E

Hello @samhartley If I were to unban you, Do you understand any further ban would result in a reinstatement of the permanent ban?

Appeal Denied Hi @Danny , Thanks for taking the time to make a ban appeal. Your appeal is very short, shows little to not remorse for your actions. While yes Intoxication may be a factor, That does not absolve you of your actions, Your ban was relatively short time ago and you attempted to...

Hello @samhartley Whilst reviewing your ban a concern is raised with your history and quality of your appeal. How can I know you won't repeat the same history that was very abundant prior to your perma ban?