Search results

There's nothing to my knowledge that is CL4 infobreach that could happen accidentally. However, the suggestion said the following: Agents and Operatives in DEA are CL3. On US, According the classified information guide, SCP-008,SCP-079 and SCP- 682 are all CL4 plus. With exemption carved out...

DEA already has a direct Joint comms line with NU-7. And for all other MTF, CL3 comms could just be used. I am not sure what purpose this would serve, and could also lead to infobreaches.

+Support It will free up staff time, and make SCP-096 game-play better. It will take up initial dev time but what doesn't. Plus SCP-096 is meant to be UNSTOPPABLE while going to a target. A person being able to body-block a unstoppable force is silly.

+Support Passive Breaches are interesting situations, and are something that should be maintained.

+Support Fighting repeatedly in SA office is getting old.

They can't already? What's the point of the Infantry Transport if it can't transport? +Support

Just wanted to add a quick experience I had, 173's containment cell was broken, and stuck open, The tech that arrived couldn't fix it as they physically couldn't reach the door at the top of the door-frame. I had to crouch and the tech had to stand on my head to fix it. This is a exact scenario...

+Support Most people look down , This doesn't work (Except for when it does sometimes for some reason?), and I assume it's due to source limitations. This could be a more consistent way to avoid viewing 096. It would be nice if looking down just worked properly, but that's wishful thinking...

While I understand the vision, and the factor of a crazy prisoner with nothing to lose. Encouraging Class-D to be more combative is something I cannot support. -Support

+Support There's already a names field, no need for a separate one.

Foundation can't use tear gas on CI due to the powerful area of effect attack (Even though there's a counter with the gas masks) CI gets a repeating grenade launcher and grenade launcher call in. With a even more powerful area of effect attack. I'm not opposed to CI having grenade launchers...

Exactly this The problem isn't the strike mission existing, It's when it right after, Basically killing the cooldown in some situations.

Correct. I should have used the word Alternative instead. I'll edit my reply to reflect that.

I agree that secondary itself may not be the best choice for a spawn, That's far from the only option. HCZ breach shelter springs to mind, It's pretty out of the way. Medbay area was also mentioned, and that would help prevent that. In general, I do think too many suggestions get held back by...

+Support AA restrictions make sense balance wise for GOI, as it's easy to obtain and very powerful. Organizations would also have motive to avoid using weapons causing too much destruction. For D-Class (Without external help) it is difficult to obtain. And they are prisoners with little to...

+Some Support The ability to push would be very useful. There is a large concern for misuse however.

How could this be abused? (Or at-least, Abused more than any other alternative spawn?) Edit: Replaced the word secondary with alternative as people were understanding that to mean Secondary Checkpoint.

Where did you get that information from? The GSD handbook states otherwise.

Very good idea. +Support

+Support Just have it show Steam ID.