Search results

-support This would just reward players to afk anywhere and would encourage complacency We shouldn't be rewarding player that don't afk in bunks If you don't want to be kidnap go to bunks, otherwise this just seems like a cope suggestion.

Let's say you had a wife, were in bed, and woke up to see her staring at you with no emotion. You ask her: What's up She then walks to the living room while you're following her After you say: What the hell is going on your wife goes into the darkest corner in the room and starts speaking Latin...

What are you on about? You can still use the roof of the two buildings to snipe people, that you can easily jump off to avoid being shot and be instantly covered. If that doesn't work, the garage and the facility itself are strong positions to defend the base.

The few things we both agreed on in ci +Support

Sure they can do it right now, however they have limited amount and if they die while holding the weapon they lose it forever, but if they a gun rack they can essentially have an opportunity to store multiple better weapons and can have a near unlimited supply of it, even if they die they can...

Tell me how this will ruin the foundation's strength to defend their base if their towers don't count towards being in base, and CI/GOC can shoot anyone on the tower regardless of whether MTF shoots or not Please explain with your SL wisdom

-support I would +Support this, but this is bound to be abused heavily, and I don't think I would like to see a bunch of Gensec having o1 weaponary because they bought them from 01.

+support guys i know a way to revive a puddle of blood we just need to find all the missing body parts.

No, I'm not referring to an actual demotion. The demotion command will just boot the player from the class, and they can return to the class once they are done with being afk. We should not be striking or removing players for being afk.

-They are kidnapped and don't want to do the RP -They will go afk, so ci/goc cannot raid during high pop (unlikely, buts its still possible) -They can also tell some players to afk so they can prevent CI/GOC from doing specific missions during a raid. This would also make kidnapping impossible...

unneeded and can be abused if they are going afk they can go on change character themselves -support

wouldn't be surprise when everyone starts complain about that because there bored.

+support

the unique thing about 076 was his speed otherwise he just a dude with a sword and weaker version of 682 +Support should honestly just get rework if people don't like his speed so much then they can have a version that has more options of weaponry to utilize

Disrupt foundation operation by hindering their chemical production

will only +support If they remove the notification for hacking attempts on scp and the reduce the hacking level back to their original state.

thanks for telling me about a good scp to use and abuse

you know its amazing how i can simply say my reason to kill this noncombatant is that our objective is to disrupt foundation operations by harming foundation personnel