Search results

>Me when people post an AI generated image of a random SA that is on a forklift that 1) I'm pretty sure wasn't spelling "administration" right and 2) why in the name of god are we posting decals of site admin on forklifts and saying thats thematic People love to downplay or say people are...

+Support You do not require raiding to be a nuisance to Foundation as CI are set out to be in lore and on the server, anyone stating otherwise is demonstrating a misunderstanding of CI's operations, or is just a combat addict. Maybe if we motivated more surface oriented combat (wait a...

First of all thank you for confirming this is going ahead, very happy to hear. Like I did kind of say in my initial suggestion, I know this area of direct suggestions isnt my expertise. For example with additional armoured vehicles or maybe different, more specific weapons, I don't really know...

+Support Keep the spiciness to yourself when you get -1 mate :p. Best of luck to yourself and Broda, I have full faith in your capabilities, but also your qualities as a person, which I think are the main foundational thing you need to ensure success. I am truly hopeful you do well.

It occurs to me I have yet to leave my response yet (my bad) +Support As per usual, someone with a vision that I respect the ambition of, and hope to assist in making it happen. With yourself and Remmy imminently ready to lead in tandem, I have my fingers crossed for the state of the server...

+Support Based on what you've explained this seems very easy to implement whilst also being a very fun way to provide RP enhancement, incentive to the cooking system and overall more fun in some interaction cases. Hope it gets added

-Support I get the idea but I literally just don't want staff to ever have to have more time per sit in an unnecessary fashion again. The removal of escalations was great, and I know a LOT of sits are being called daily as of late, if this was implemented, we'd have 10 minute backlogs for...

Would you be up to elaborating?

Replying just before I head out; and in conjunction with Niox. The thing is, this isn't a push for surface RP, it's a push for them to actually do their primary duties on surface which is be a sufficient and strong combat force, because the knock on effect is that if they can actually have the...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The Premise: This suggestion would provide basis for Content Team to perform a relatively quick balance update for surface combat, specifically targetted to SOP forces within the combat gameplay. Now, I am aware that DEA has already been receiving...

-Support I want to make this clear that I LOVE this suggestion because I love the CCTV system and I use it a lot to catch unknowns out and give scp callouts for site staff during C1/C5s. HOWEVER, the system feels like one of the worst rendered/optimised we have on the server. I genuinely feel...

I see NL are already deemed as required for this, but, in the interest of additional feedback; +SUPPORT PLEASE DO THIS FOR THE LOVE OF GODDDDDDDDDD Let's just put this into a POV, map changes on a full server are VERY risky to do. Your event has to have justifiable scope to involve the full...

Y'know one of these days I'm going to figure out the obsession US players have with making reasonings/answers about matters related to the server about the individual outside of the server. This is the third time in a row I've given an opinion on something and to date I've been told that I'm...

+Support What broda said. It's actually unironically a really fun minigame, I'd do that over hacking to earn Support XP even at a smaller rate if needs be.

Making this about me being O5 is certainly a moment of all time, pop off Kito, very mature. The point I'm making is that 1) this system adds to the workload of staff unnecessarily 2) it isn't their responsibility in the first place to manage this problem and 3) I unironically think that the...

-Support The inability of an immature player to not "crash out" and MRDM or do something stupid to get them banned because they're facing an addiction (which 9 times out of 10 is boredom, annoyance over how they used to enjoy the server and can't anymore due to changes or just overall being...

Conditional -Support So this is actually probably one of the most interesting suggestions I've seen in a hot minute. Pretty creative idea too and you've clearly expanded on the vision, so credit where it's due. Unfortunately I think this is extremely impractical to implement. We're still fresh...

+Support With the feedback I've heard from chats I've had from Athena, as well as your active hands on approach that is a sore thing this server needs from a -1 right now, I think that logically, it has to be you. I've got nothing but good experience with you on the server, you're approachable...

I mean I'm open to the idea being implemented in several different ways, even in the name I say that it doesn't have to be ALL of E-11 getting the beams. I'd love the addition of that beam pickup on both servers as it's kinda like my second suggestion, but the fact of the matter is that whilst...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion offers two possible solutions to the complaints that E-11 have given in feedback to myself and other members of the server regarding the difficulty in finishing off and recontaining SCP breaches; 1) Allow more E-11 jobs to just...