Search results

you are a disgrace to your singature

+fish 🐟

Content discussion Were one step closer.

-support And not even because Im against removing combat repairs, I dont really like combat repairs, but because this suggestion doesnt really prevent them in 1 simple scenario: raids. This means that if, for example, CI raids compound with a BTR and F has a LAV, it can either lead to both sides...

Pretty uncommon at least for me. With some luck I think about 1/5 for 30-40 sec. Reliably under a min tho. I know Im defo not the best, and far away from bad, so yeah.

+/- neutral Honestly Im split on this. Yes, 008 is a powerful SCP to breach. If done right, it can cause a nuke by itself. And that is the issue, IF DONE RIGHT. You pretty much need to get to HCZ uncalled, get to 008 uncalled, use NHU to get the party through the airlock, hack a CL4 bio without...

Ha 💸 ha 💸 ha 💸 ha 💸 ha 💸 + 💸 support💸

+support Intentional or not, 096 would discombobulate anyone in his path. And I dont even think the downside you mentioned is even that big of a downside. 096 is already one of the most tightly controlled and rule-bound SCP (hence the forum app just to play it), so if someone does abuse the...

Now there I think you misunderstand my point. Your suggestions says, and I quote: And while yes, CI raids prob even more than 5-6 times a day, your issue is not with the raids itself, but the scenario when you get: CI raid - Strike Mission - CI raid And in practice, there is no difference if...

-support And let me tell you why. While the points you bring up make somewhat sense, there is one big issue. THE POINTS YOU BRING UP ARE NOT CI SPECIFIC AT ALL When GOC gets a strike mission on Foundation while CI raids, does it not pull away combatives? When Foundation gets a strike mission on...

+support Makes sense for the higher placed cams, it doesnt really make sense that you just fix it from 2 meters away with the force or smth. My only issue could be prop blocking/mindge, but just making it so you can shoot/topple it can fix that.

In that case, why not keep the steamID instead of a name, prob not in the same place but yk, place it on the side/corner. Yes, it would still allow for meta if someone looks hard enough but at least it wont be immidatelly obvious whos calling. And staff can still do their thing, since they can...

-support Revives are already situational as is, with them bring hyper inconsistent time-wise, head/limb pops, vaporizations, only being able to be revived once, needing downtime and the more then likely chance of the patient being stuck if they are within 3m of a wall. And you lose all of your shit.

You know the feature is obscure when even a cs doest know about it +support

why not ig helps the gms at least +support

lmao anyways +support, as you stated the amount of cams made their usability ass, so it prob had the opposite effect (rather than more coverage its less because no one looks at them) than intended

This must be a US issue, Ive never seen that happen on UK. But yeah, Id find this an IC issue that should be dealt with via IC consequences as breaking safe passage or something, as this suggestion feels like ruleplay instead. So -support. however it brings me an idea :sneaky:

De kommer, hjælp os!

+support On this note add killstreaks as well. So for example, if you kill 25 in one life you get the Davy Crocket.

-support This solves a problem that doesnt exist. Need to combat a raid? From GENSEC, SCU, and possibly SRU. Want to fight breaches? SCU. You might wonder why they dont get more, but that is not what they are designed to do. And ik its General Security but still, there are 2 regiments to...