Search results

A very good point. I don't think anyone has a issue with GMs using a slightly larger PAC for a event as normally there isn't 30-40 of them active at a time. I think another solution would be a rule to limit such a workaround with people using pac3 able to be asked to stream their screen for a...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: [This would reenforce the limits initially set for PAC to prevent someone from making a PAC that lags the server to oblivion so they can look pretty, specifically blocking using Imagur and the like to import materials over the 15mb limit, as right now...

Fuck no. Dude SCPs are already easy as fuck to breach.

Pocket 500s would be cool if they were like 30k (it is a limited SCP tbh) +Support

Not done soon=/=never

Based God Dev Judge vs no rights OSA

Nah it won't. If you do FProfiler in console and walk around a bit the main lag source is poorly made and compressed PAC3, and then the Vcomputers which we have WAY too many of around site (Medbay has 5-6, ethics has 7-8, Research has 6, etc), and then there's the latent checks constantly going...

Do you have a clip of that? Because math ain't mathin here. Did you THREATEN the A-1? What'd they do to break frp? Etc?

Yeah hold up wtf who told you this? Why in god's name would only 2 regiments be exempted of FearRP? I'll just show you my ID and have you in cuffs a second later for Amnestics. Unless you mean you threatened to kill them (which would make them fear of capture or death) and they cyanide'd to...

Soooo, you broke rules, attacked a foundation member, got caught even IC doing it for little to no reason, had to do virtual crouches and spelling or whatever (nevermind you didn't even do PT just got mad about it) and are mad at the A-1 telling your leadership what you did? Seems like you...