Search results

PAC Requesting Approval Pac Requested: Site-Administration (SM in specific) SteamID: STEAM_0:0:86507562 Photograph of Pac: Lore background: https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/personnel-file:the-reverend-anton-weckert

-Support. AO already have their niche; I do not see how further giving them traits given to E11 and Nu7 is healthy for the spread of playerbase between regiments.

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @WestIshere Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Shinan Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment...

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Sixatron Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment...

Actually being able to provide a role within the RSD hierarchy that can be given a modicum of trust to act in an appropriate way would be a godsend. The ability for RSD to make policy based upon the assumption that there is a group of players that can be relied upon to perform quality RP and...

+Support. Harvey has consistently provided me guidance and support during my time so far as SA, and I would gladly see him continue to do so as the Site Director

Is this the right file?

I

Remove all rules regarding codenames, have it be an IC matter. This gives Site-Admin and the respective CO teams more liberty on who'se identities they feel like should be protected, and will hopefully introduce the sense that codenames should be for the protection of ones' identity, not for...

TO: Human Resources, North-Atlantic Regional Directorate(HUMAN_RESOURCES@REG_DIR.SCP.FN.US) FROM: Deputy Director Eleanor Combina, Site-288 (E.COMBINE@SA.SITE_288.SCP.FN.EN) CC: O5-8's Liaison Office (OVERWATCH8@SITE_01.SCP.FN) Good afternoon, I am writing you today as a formal request for the...

Don't worry about it pal! The GM team is just memeing on this thread because ██ ████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ███████, ██ █████████ ███ ██████████ █████!

I do agree with providing CI more warfunds through some method. But I do not agree with doing so for hacking SCP's, as this will further motivate breaching for breaching's sake, which can limit other RP scenarios.

My support to this ████████ is ████████ because I cannot ████ the ██████ in the ████████. Truly yours, - ██████████████████ (Ok fr. How is staff meant to judge if this lore background is passable when they cannot read the damn thing lmao-)

+Sup, lovely major when I was in Nu7 when it came to providing creative freedom for the regiment.

Because CI balancing is based upon them being outnumbered. In that calculation, ISD are considered as an opposing force.

That is one very neat backstory, I love the mystery it keeps while giving you just enough knowledge to get the gist of what has gone down in the character's past. For you Hmods (Who I've been told don't like to read lore, grrrrrrr!) this one's worth reading. There's nothing wrong with it either...

I appreciate the step this is taking, but at the same time I do have some worries about making ISD weaker as combatatives having a negative impact upon the duration of CI holds, specifically in Chemlab/SA wing where they tend to be the main bulk of forces alongside IE/GSD.

+support Combine this with a decrease to the HP of 035, and you basically get a much more lore-accurate and, IMO, enjoyable SCP-035 experience. From the SCP side, you get more manipulation time, which is a *really* cool aspect of SCP-035 that is not utilised nearly as often as it should be...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Allow users to 'shred' a keycard using the document shredders that are placed around the site. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: I don't believe so. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least...