Search results

Suggest that, then.

I do actually agree. However, based on both my previous suggestion of exactly this being rejected before, and the general view I've seen from the playerbase of raising hell whenever someone suggests any notable change because it doesn't benefit them personally, and then NL/CT/SL that are in...

Yeah, because when I go to work at the big company I work for, I regularly see the board of directors just roaming around when the head office is in another country. My manager and my manager's managers? Not the focus, so why would I ever see them.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Reduces SC/AO's presence on the server without removing them. Specifically, I am suggesting that for O5 and EC, all of the jobs be joined into two jobs instead of 6 needlessly separate ones. One job called "Ethics Committee Member" and one job called...

+Support. I would, however, propose that 966 have very low health, but only be visible through the LIDAR mechanic that was teased but never released three years ago. Maybe also combine that with having multiple like @Evil suggested.

On UK, mass termination refers to terminating all D-class found outside of D-block without warnings. USA mass terms were always MRDM.

+Support A bunch of sounds need to have their attenuation lowered.

Me when that isn't what the suggestion is asking for.

Yes. With them being classed as E&TS now, realistically, they could just spawn in the main E&TS room and then they'd have all that anyway, plus the ability to coordinate with those other roles better. Yes. Yes. Yes to the former, but I'm not sure about the quiz part - maybe if it was a CL3 job...

In the long run, I think the system for figuring out if voice can be heard like this could do with updates. Maybe something like a microphone/speaker combo that can be used for things like this and containment chambers and the like? For this specifically, you can technically speak through this...

Thanks for reminding me of the nuke, edited to mention that.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Adds an incentive for non-combatives to actually avoid danger and value their own lives: an XP and/or cash bonus for surviving a breach. Foundation non-combatives should receive an XP and/or cash bonus for surviving a containment breach from start to...

The surface crate shit never made sense. Just make anything you can get from them accessible from the Foundation chef NPCs and leave the crates to the surface jobs.

+Support Do this and then let people make multiple characters on the same faction for different roles. No more chems and items being magically obtained by Tech Expert John the Minge because Thaumatologist Jack the Slightly Less Minge farmed fhem

Me when I die to a random D-class and lose the RP document that took 3 weeks of work because the briefcase didn't drop.

Me when it literally isn't.

Ideally, it being below the limit would activate a containment blocker. Realistically, it would just stay as-is. Disabled when under the limit. Allowed, because it's really not much of an issue, and during downtime it's more of a detriment than a benefit, because you then can't interact with...

imo this isn't a good reason to keep anything. Invading countries all over the world has been a long part of the UK's history, doesn't mean we should keep doing that.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Makes it so that there is a level of one or more of the following that, below these limits, SCPs cannot breach at all: MTF online Foundation CL4s online Total server population Foundation combatives online The option I would personally prefer would...

+Support Was planning to suggest this myself. The way it works at the moment is that if you try to pick up a freshly dispensed Field Kit while already having one, the new one just disappears from existence, with you gaining no benefit from it. At the moment, there's no way to replenish them...