Search results

I don't think double doors are really an issue outside of the ones that are placed badly and leave one side unrepairable.

I find it fun but wish it was more in depth. I also think that the way it is atm creates issues (unobserved NITRP and lack of RP opportunities) that could be solved.

Could be reduced effect based on armour level.

Meeting Room Medbay Interrogation Room Armoury Those are the only things I can think of, but they would be nice to have - 2 more rooms than what exist now

While it would be nice to have those areas, I can see why they're not there. I think it makes sense for now to just leave them out until there's actual plans for what should be there. The AA can already just go in e.g. the storage room attached to the garage hallway, and I'm fairly sure there is...

Shit out of luck unless there's logs. But there's probably gonna be logs.

Either just accept that those clips become unusable or just have staff confirm via logs for certain things (e.g. the person in the clip shoots known player ABC at XYZ time - staff can check who did that in logs to confirm their identity).

Maybe something more like a larger XP amount with a long cooldown, rather than XP per stab, to prevent people from gaining too much XP from being farmed.

As far as I'm aware, every SCP has an ACS decal on UK

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Removes this style of sign from the different containment chambers: This will mean that if things like the security clearance of a room changes, the sign isn't left outdated and unable to be corrected, or if people want to put up newer ACS signage...

You never know if another dev might join or priorities might change in the future 🤷‍♂️ Plus, it just means that rather than facing another new suggestion of the same thing every few months or whatever, it's on the dev tracker to point to as "yes, we want to do it, even if we currently can't".

Isn't that the point of a backlog, though? To put things on there that are planned/wanted to be done at some point, even if they're unlikely to be done in the immediate future?

I realise that a fair amount of this would require an art dev to make quite a bit from scratch, but like with anything, I'd rather CT accept it and just put it in the backlog to be picked up even in like 3 years time or whenever rather than just deny it outright and then never be done.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Expand the female suit models' bodygroups and other options to have parity with the male ones. At the moment, the male suit models have a massive variety of suit/tie combos, including: That's not even including the bodygroups on these models, such...

tbh backspawning in general is a bit of a mess. Would be good if there could be an actual mechanic to enforce it instead of just having to know yourself. Like, if you have just gotten on the server, flag on Nu-7, and spawn in garage the first time, how are you supposed to know if there's people...

+Support The fines are already a thing on UK, but anything involving department money is really annoying to handle. I think maybe adding the fines to the warfunds or something like that could be done to avoid people abusing it for personal gain.

o7

o7

I like the idea of making SCPs able to be stolen by CI in general. Give them a containment chamber or two and let them steal 012 or 035 or something, and have it remain there until Foundation steals it back or GOC destroys it.

We have no idea when that might be coming, for all we know it'll be here in 2030, so that's not very helpful. Given this also is intended to address existing issues with Site-65, switching to Site-9 won't solve the issues that will still existin on Site-65 and still affect its players, even if I...