Search results

I appreciate the feed back :) Though, I will say the doors are usually broken by just a solo instance. I don't really have a clip or anything but i recall a single instance upon a new breach literally just shredding through it.. You can't really rely on combative getting there in time as more...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The E-11 “Biohazard specialist” is given a Decontamination foam gun with infinite spray (Currently only possessed by ERT and the Osuit) They are an official “Biohazard” unit, and are vital in 008 breaches in clearing spores. The regular...

I hope you know if you change 914 to CL 3, they are going to add a cl 3 in D block to balance things out.. (Stated from a previous suggestion) - / + Support, would cause a lot of changes with Unforeseen Consequences....

+ Support Would be a nice tool tbh

he can, he just cant target / lock onto them

Powerful in the sense of - being strong. Imagine if 173 could target ERT. You would have full ERT wipes and guaranteed nukes more often. Yes, they have to be immuned to certain SCPs. Is it fair? no, but thats the entire point of ERT. its a final resort before everything gets blown up. Even...

- Support ERT will literally get full wiped every breach.. ERT is MEANT to be powerful. Any breach where ERT gets called, 9/10 096 is included in that list. They cant just FOCUS on one SCP while attempting to ensure their scramble gear doesn't fail.

- Support There is no RP to 914 being used at low pop and the only way to stop a D class is metagaming as the D class will kill you the moment you ask for ID. The update genuinely made it harder for D class to escape which i would argue is good

+ Support

I don't see why tech experts cant have a UI keeping it on. It times of mass panic a simple system can get overlooked or buried in chat.

it'd be different from how janitors see it. It would literally just be a little pop up saying that there is a downed system. No other indicator for anything else. Realistlcy the foundation would be able to actively tell what systems are down so

- Support Sorry advil I loved doing it to, but this was a needed change.

Not true actually - I see techies use /ets all the time. We have the channel set up we might as well let it be used more by a role who requests them the most

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: - Give GSD Sergeant+ (GSD Sergeant, Captain, and CoS) access to ETS comms - For Techies, give them a slight HUD to show if any systems are down. - (Would only be for Tech experts as they are the "Advanced" technical / repair job) Has something...

"You can put phosphorus into the vents, does it happen? Absolutely not cause we have a fricking nuke" + Support

if reactor goes out. it is NOT ending in 10-15 minutes

- support would be impossible to rc, bad for server health

+ Support E-11 closes HCZ at times (high profile testing, breaches, low staffing, etc) would be nice to see an alert we can ring off to make it feel more in depth

i'd argue the opposite actually. if they DID raid for the intent of killing people . the higher cleaerance would pay out more. they'd likely roam site in hopes to kill cl4s. Currenty the regular kill for anyone is $50. you could easily lower MTF / base combative kills while keeping it higher...

-support