its less so just a job removal. Its more of a job replacement, ISD and SC isolate themselves from most rp around site obviously due to secrecy but this restricts RP, putting these people in positions that are accessible by all would be far superior
remove CI, over rated and dumb addition tbh.
Even still, CI could be considered a more core aspect for foundation as an opposing force for surface units than SC is.
Agreed, people saying it won't be implemented even though they are +supporting it are ultimately dragging the idea down through their own deception. This is genuinely a necessary change that should be made to expand on the Core of the Site, 62 slots of the server can be taken up by ISD...
+Support
Dude this is a fantastic suggestion.
We do NOT need 4 MTFs on this site alongside Security, IA and DEA.
O5 and EC do NOT need to be on the Site.
SA are supposed to be O5s arm on the Site anyways and EC could have a liaison role.
THE GAMEPLAY LOOP IS BECOMING STAGNANT AND BORING...
-Support
Effort you put into the application and I have seen you on GSD recently however I don't feel like you've progressed in GSD enough to be requesting this position.
Good luck.
PAC Requesting Approval
https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/gsd-semi-combative-suit-pac3.24293/
THE FOLLOWING ARE EDITS TO THE PAC LINKED ABOVE
PAC Requested (Which job): Security Captain & Chief of Security
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:648540008
Photograph of PAC:
PAC Requesting Approval
PAC Requested (Which job): Security Captain & Security Chief
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:648540008
Photographs of PAC:
MODEL USAGE
BASE MODEL = GSD CAPTAIN, for those who have PAC3 turned off I should look like a regular captain as well as provide a beret for the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.