Search results

Sure fail raid may be another issue, however the result would still be every document being destroyed. A CI DC or any of the listed could just NHU into areas with no staff on and destroy EVERY document. A horrid idea to add this in it's current state with the current playerbase.

Gulp. I've broken into every base as Parawatch

O5 should be more hidden as a whole. I honestly think a Assistant role should be made for anyone with O5 WL to play, as an O5 would not be on site that frequently and would send a representative.

You most certainly have seen my chow down on 20 Chocolate bars in Floor 3

Wasnt me but I feel called out

Gentlemen, I may not have a brain, but I have an idea.

This I can agree to, I went through hell arguing with people when creating policy back as SC because I wanted to grant CL3's more "power". I was met with claims that'd it only cause minges and ruin Roleplay. There is a lack of trust towards anyone that's not CL4 by some members. My personal...

About god damn time. I'm going to make sure you have such a headache :))))

The moment you put an "or" in a Suggestion they don't know what to do. As @Snake said before, it's not up to CT to adjust a Suggestion. So better hope you type it perfectly

Much like your skin, you can take them off.

Love it. Yes. +Support Me when I cant wear Scrambles 24/7 for no reason

Honestly, I like this. Deepcovers are meant to be CI agents that have either turned treasonous, been blackmailed or have infiltrated the Foundation via other means such as via Recruitment, and are not supposed to be 2 Randoms jumping down some vents and stealing some guys ID. This would...

2 year break? Oh god have I been here that long. Welcome back man

You can just noclip to the chef and eat it in your inventory...

I realise I have made a minor mistake, I believed the Rule suggestions were responded to by CT, which spurred this suggestion. My issue boiled down to frustration regarding suggestions that are just shut down with "We have discussed this and said no" While this doesn't happen all too often, it...

Can we get some lore to explain the arms/sword/hook?

All depends on which member of CT is responding, it can be so incredibly inconsistent, hence why I ask for a requirement.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: As the name states, Content team should always give a reason for denial. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Nope. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): >Players know why suggestions...

You seem like the kinda guy to yell "You're not GSD, get off catwalk" at anyone on catwalk. also "unfairly camping in a area" - It's a prison man, don't assume you escape "RP" comes first "only other way to get to the other side of d-block." - you mean catwalk? I already see way more issues...