Search results

+Support Looks weird on the surface, makes sense IMO.

+Support I also think regimental hardcaps should not have cross-server parity. I fundamentally disagree with the hardcaps in the first place (outside of AO), because they create an artificial scarcity to roles that really shouldn't have them, that are already restricted out the wazoo - Arbitrary...

What? Zen, we have both been E-11 COs. We have both had (Or at least, maybe only I've had?) the CSG interview requirement for going from CSG -> LT. Admittedly, this was almost 2 years ago now and E-11 reqs have changed a lot since then, so I don't know what they are like now, but I don't see...

I vaguely remember a time when it was breakable and IIRC the problem was that D-Class always use that door being broken as an excuse to riot, which makes it impossible to fix because they're always killing any techies that try to fix it. It's endemic of some of the design issues inherent to...

As an 096 main, I find it kinda stupid that 096 can't break the outer watchtower doors. I get why SCPs normally can't break it, but for 096 specifically is just a straight-up trap and accounts for roughly 85% of my annoyances whenever I play 096 and a breach goes to D-Block. It's the most unfun...

But then that's "FailRP" and "unrealistic behaviour for your role as you are not an armed combatant that would have any reason to assault the facility"

+Major Support You're not thinking big enough. DCs should be able to set up "fake" cameras that look like the normal CCTV cameras around the site, but they're actually CI cameras. Imagine, you're a response unit walking around LCZ and you notice a camera on the wall above CPC-ish. You ask the...

...I can see this idea working - Not as-is, though. The only changes I would make to make this more viable is maybe putting this in LCZ electrical, in one of the EZ maintenance tunnels, or in the D-Block maintenance area itself - Then making the actual fix for this two-way, so that this can be...

+Major Support Give me schizo crazy people willing to try and break into the site and just straight up start killing people

Seconded - I think these factors were overlooked when the decision to remove the armour packs was made. It feels like a knee-jerk reaction to the abuse by Juggernauts. The packs should stay.

That's not what I'm trying to say - I'm not talking about long-term performance, I'm talking in the moment. Imagine all the RP leadership roles doing stuff with props and one or two ongoing RP enhancements at the same time. ...Huh. Alright, then. If it's viable, sure. I just have doubts, is...

-Support We have actually had this discussion to death - I myself recall a couple suggestions on this, could only find this via searching: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/trusted-member-role-prop-spawning.21558/ But I do recall a more recent suggestion that asked for RP leadership...

You'd be surprised how dumb people can be about bringing things, especially mentalities, into other things :rolleyes: I'd agree that's not something we should be balancing content around, but it's also not something to ignore.

IIRC, this kind of thing has been denied in the past for reasons like "it making chat seem dead" and "ruining people's ability to spectate ongoing RP interactions" or something along those lines. I don't have the actual past suggestions in front of me. I think it is about time to resuggest this...

I know on UK that we've apparently seen gang mentality crop up in departments/regiments to the point where we had to scrap site policy in the past because it was causing it. My question here is whether this would provide a meaningful outlet for that behaviour or whether it would exacerbate it...

I do think that, at least for F roles, ocomms should not be as easy to use as it is. Ideally, you'd want little slip-ups to turn into RP as a result, but honestly, it's just abused more than anything else by the 15,532nd cadet of the day minging and yelling about how "the O5 council sent A-1 to...

Major -Support I get the intent and spirit of this and agree with the general premise, especially with the idea of being able to choose where you start in Foundation in GSD, RSD, Medical or E&TS roles. But I also appreciate that that in itself may be damaging to the D-Class/GSD/RSD gameplay loop...

That's also a good idea - I've added it to the suggestion, but explicitly as a setting, as I know that the free-use RSD fridges are useful for sharing the VIP-only beakers with players and I don't think preventing that by default is a good idea. With a setting, each regiment/department could...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The ability for fridges to eject/destroy all empty containers. It should probably be a function restrictable to specific jobs/regiment ranks, per fridge (Exec+ for RSD Chem Lab fridges, LT+/DELCOM+ for Regimental fridges, etc.) - This could be...

There was this just over half a year ago: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/add-logs-to-chem-fridges-for-commanding-officer.32074/ Disagreed with the denial reasoning then, disagree with it now. +Major Support I'll repeat what I said there: At the very least, let RP leadership...