Search results

While I understand the roleplay aspect of the strike, striking in this server is allowed but to a limit. You are still not allowed to kill D-Class who choose to not participate in your rp. This scenario is the same as if I'd say that any D-Class who aren't brutes have to die because they're...

Hello Dmitry. Myself and Pan were the staff members who banned you, I initially dealt with the situation while Pan gave a second opinion that agreed with my own. From my perspective, the situation went as follows: Initially, in RP, I was playing as a D-Class scout and was lining up in the...

Chambers loves nuts

Neutral (Leaning to -Support) + Active (from what I've seen IG) +/- Unsure of TS activity +/- Little to none RP interaction -Large amount of warnings

:D can i pet

Neutral +/- Unaware of TS/IG activity +/- Few if any interactions IG If i see you around some more I may change my verdict. Good Luck!

Hello @{Mercs}DoR , I have reviewed your application and decided on my following verdict: +Support + Active IG + Active TS + Previous staff experience on MRP + Previous leadership positions + Good RP interactions Good Luck!

Hello @Sheb19275 , after reviewing your application I've decided on the following verdict: -Support +Active IG +/- Average TS activity +/- Limited interaction - Previously mentioned extensive warnings with no explanation -Rushed application Nonetheless, Good Luck!

Hello @Ferrit , after reviewing your application I've decided on the following verdict: +Support +Well written application +Active IG +Leadership roles (O1 MJR) +/- Limited interaction with you IG +/- Unaware of TS activity Good Luck!

Hello @CyberGman , After careful consideration, my verdict on this application is: Neutral My reasoning for this is as follows: +Leadership role on security +No previous warnings or bans +/-Few interactions +/-Unknown maturity Due to my few interactions with you It forces my hand to a...

Hello @Chambers , After careful consideration, my verdict on this application is: +Support My reasoning for this is as follows: +Active IG and in TS +Good RP +Good rule knowledge +No previous warnings or bans +Good interactions

Hello @William Affton , After careful consideration, my verdict on this application is: +Support My reasoning for this is as follows: +Active +Good RP +No previous warnings or bans +/-Few interactions Due to my few interactions with you, I will be contacting you in discord for a talk...

Hey @Sven Sky ! After careful consideration, my verdict on this application is: +Support My reasoning for this is as follows: +Active +Good rule knowledge +Great leader in MTF +Good interactions +Friendly and Mature + Previous staff experience -Previous warning

Neutral (Leaning to +Support) +Good application +No prior warnings/bans +Staff experience +/- No prior interaction +/- Unsure of activity