Gonna have to go with a -Support due to my understanding. I'm not going to comment on removal from Cl4 positions
SA+ Should realistically be trusted to deal with people breaking IC rules
For example. Let's say a Researcher breaks sampling policy and a Site Advisor catches them, but there are...
+Support
Rn Potent is just not worth it for how little you get compared to Dianabol
(Pretty sure it was only changed to needing a Bunsen burner to try and make chemists relevant)
Id say that IA does Need a new/better gun
Wether it's a stat update for the P90 or a change in the gun itself
For one, you cannot deny that IA needs to go Combative from time to time, and having a gun as inconsistent as the P90 straight up is ass to deal with
I can understand for maybe Cl0-3 Comms, but beyond that it could be reasonably believed to be secured enough to not be readable by 079
And Def not Cl5 comms
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.