Search results

I will say, I understand where you going here, but the vast majority of the playerbase won't look at is as RP realism, and more like a nerf for Nu-7. I would be 100% down for this change if the keycard system worked like how Site-9s keycard system has been teased to be. Additionally, the...

I'm NOT going to read this entire discussion, my main questions is...: Why specifically Nu-7? Why not also E-11 and UNGOC? CI are already halfway there. I understand why AO should be CL3, but why is Nu-7 being "nerfed" in this case?

Older versions of the map had this, not exactly sure why it was changed.

Read the rule definition for what counts as breaching 008, then redo the math.

This is an issue that needs to be solved with the department/faction leads in question, is it not? Nowhere in the rules does it say that the activity requirement is.

honestly i’d be fine with this if the decontam airlock cant be hacked with less that 90 players or sumth

Make 073 whitelisted

This is already the case no?

the goat speaks!

who?

The humble Potent Dulox flask:

Better late than never I guess…

here comes the popcorn

This is very true, and this is exactly one of the reasons E-11 being able to call ERT is a bad idea. If E-11 is being replaced by ERT (which we don’t want), then obviously we wont give them the authority to call them in. E-11 should recieve more content and be given more ability in actually...

+support I believe for all the issues that people are bringing up here about your attitude are quite true, but I still believe this can be rectified and resolved on your own time. Outside of this, I am very confident in your ability to lead ISD from the few interactions I’ve had with you, so...

I have no issue with the job changes or any of the equipment additions, but the ERT authorisation transferral thing I don’t like. The issue currently with SCP breaches on UK at least from my perspective, is their frequency and duration. ERT will arrive if a breach has lasted too long, so I feel...

After I saw that you were from Vietnam, bro I know EXACTLY who you are. HUGE +supp, welcome back (another relapser…)

I don’t interact with you much from recent memory, but I have no negative thoughts currently outside if the EXTENSIVE warnings list. Neutral, leaning +Support

+support Only issue with the app is that it could use some more detail. Additionally, your last warning was within a month, which doesn’t exactly bode well for your chances. Outside if that, pretty chill guy, haven’t has any negative interactions at all so good shit :)

+support, pretty cool and professional guy, but I feel like previous infractions should also be a part of the staff application but who am I to judge :)