Search results

Alright. +Support

Seems good. +/- Neutral on this specifically. If the HCZ bulks are closed than that just traps 966s in HCZ with nothing to do - Which is fine during a large-scale breach at high pop (because eventually the bulks will be opened and either they'll be fought or otherwise will just be able to...

You unlock access to buy the skin? So you don't get the skin, you just get the opportunity to buy it? Is this not worse than how things are right now, where you can just buy it?

Pay money to be able to trigger mostly combative effects with no cooldown? Why not just turn the server into a purely combative server at that point?

I mean, it seems complicated because I presented it in such a long fashion. Boiled down, it's just "Has the player on SCP job been on server at all in the past month (Apart from now)? Yes? Add this many hack levels to hacking them out."

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add a movement-enhancing gas mask that is exclusively obtainable by putting a gas mask through 914 on Fine. Additionally consider a hazmat variant. It would function identically to the original vWar item pre-refinement, except while worn it provides...

The monkey's paw curfls...

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/make-radios-save-channels-better.32723/ It's apparently an "intended mechanic" 😔

I agree with the general premise, however counterpoint - Why not have the bodycam's clipping function emulate a (bindable) keypress once it is complete once it's finished the progress bar? Then bind your clipping software key to that, so all you have to do is hit the bodycam clip button...

I am once again stating that this idea has been tabled in the past.

...Aye, fair enough. +Support

And why would Techies be using the hole? Outside of a sanctioned usage (of which I struggle to find a valid RP contextualisation to permit a Tech to actually use 1162) that also doesn't make any sense, and is just straight FailRP. Content should not be balanced around the misuse of said content...

Why would non-D-Class Foundation jobs be using 1162? Most situations I can think of are just FailRP - The only jobs I can see using 1162 with valid RP context are D-Class... Maybe AO? Then civs, CI & GOC.

Give TG's materialise RPG-7 :087:

Hm. +Support

I get the intent, but this is... Way too much right now. You're effectively asking for full-on reworks of 5 separate-but-related systems and 2 new ones. Furthermore, I feel like even if this were implemented, this would exacerbate some extant unhealthy mentalities in the playerbase regarding...

😔 I get the reasoning - I think the biggest reason most people dislike moving away from the original 173 is that all the 'new takes' on it that I've seen like in SL and such, kinda try too hard to go into the 'creepy'/'horror' factors - But IMO, the original 173 has like a kinda "creepy-cute"...

Containment maintenance, my beloved I feel like this specifically would just result in more slop testing "RP" akin to how sampling is now - Making testing more of a chore than a medium.

UK Nu7 CPL here. On UK, Jugg is still not allowed in D-Block without a valid reason.

...Yeah. Alright. I feel like you should also be able to pop the queue by hacking a containment box - Hack box -> Hack successful -> Player at the front of queue is flagged onto that SCP -> Breach. That way, you could make asking in OOC for an SCP to flag on for breach against the rules and just...