Search results

+support it's really unfun to use codewords to catch intruders especially since there's no way to counter it - even if you successfully use a codeword you'll be metagamed and brought to a sit where they'll ask how you know the codeword. Requirements of a code sheet to be printable, hackable, or...

+support radios are so useful especially as a D-class escapee who wants to coordinate things 😍😍😍 in those scenarios i'd always just contact a GM and say smth like: "I escaped the facility and have met with CI/GOC/whoever, in this case it'd be resonable that if I asked them for a radio that...

^^^ this is a very good point, this would only be useful in such a specific scenario so you gotta ask is it worth all the extra hassle that'd come from adding it as a rule?

+support ERT turrets should definitely still be able to target him (ERT are meant to be OP by design) I also think it'd be very cool if facility blackouts were manually done to help fight a 966 breach as it'd make containing him much more unique and a bigger priority (kill 966 fast so you can...

+support they literally had keypads in his cell so people could do this b4 unless you join a MTF or CI you can't practice conveniently any other way

overall +-neutral but leaning to +support you absolutely cooked on the scp reworks although quite a few of them would be impossibly difficult to code i imagine 7722 rework, as cool as it is, just seems like a recycled version of 096 and no info is given on how you'd figure out who is "evil" and...

my bad man i didn't consider anything about international pages 👍👍👍 thanks for clarifying what you meant, if i'm not misunderstanding you i think we're both in agreement in what we want coming out of CI?

+support entirely makes sense unless there is a method implemented to change the name on a keycard any card you get will have another person on the map with the same name in the past it's always been a grey area- in my experience some mods will say "only someone who, IC, would know who that...

-support for all reasons listed here (including ohio suggestion) a fix for this problem is coming soon, not allowing people to express their opinions on a current situation will stop people from getting any good feedback (e.g. if i see loads of people complaining that i'm doing a shit event...

ci-wiki.wikidot.com user detected 🤮🤮🤮 using shit from ci-wiki.wikidot.com is like going to poundland and expecting the same quality of products as going to M&S On the 'CI wiki' there are 80 articles written collectively by 20 people, and of those 20 people 2 PEOPLE HAVE WRITTEN HALF THE ARTICLES...

final solution to the CI problem 🤯🤯 the way you describe CI is exactly how i wish it would be (an organisation full of deep covers who pretend to work in the foundation, and rare facility raids) but you definitely knew as you were writing this that what you're hoping for is utterly unachievable...

+support

-support never make a suggestion again if you are suggesting to nerf d-class scout

+-neutral I second what @YandereMuffin said tbh During a breach the feature can be really useful. Considering the time it takes an SCP to destroy a bulkhead I think it should take an equal amount of time for a techie to repair it, if not even slower. Maybe also implement a feature that stops...

> rural canadian area > naturally suggests mosins and karabiners

+support/+-neutral > "the system is convoluted and needs to be reworked!" > suggests convoluted system you raise some good points about the current system requiring a 'master of one zone' having to oversee all other zones even if their experience doesn't cover it, but i think another big system...

make a suggestion that does exactly what this suggestion does only at low pop when it actually makes sense to do this 🤯🤯

-support once every hour an A-1 makes himself a freedom and nobody else can do it- get good at guarding 914 and your problem is solved‼️‼️

D-Class Helicopter 🤯🤯