Rule Suggestion Change the HIMARS rule

[roach3]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Make it so that youre not allowed to HIMARS inside your own signs, or inside your own base during the base raid

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
No

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Makes it more fair, we shouldnt be able to get HIMARSED inside their base or signs

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
none

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
because they shouldnt be allowed to HIMARS their own signs/base

clip of someone firing himars in signs/base, appears to be sven sky
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kan8dubFKV5c7AKmS?invite=cr-MSxrZUMsNTA2NTE1NjI

 

[Maverick]

base raided in under 10min and is still complaining lol

 

[roach3]

base raided in under 10min and is still complaining lol

thats irrelevant to himarsing your own base

 

[Elpatroon]

Clip of elpatroon himarsing inside signs/base

I was in a heli roach... I killed you with a viper.

 

[roach3]

I was in a heli roach... I killed you with a viper.

you didnt kill me, killed some other tank later on
i asked 10th who fired the himars and someone said elpatroon, and i asked are you 100% sure, and they said yeah
i can see its a hydra tho and it wasnt you

 

[Jeff Carson]

It was Sven who fired it we planned it all day because we knew you’d all rush that gate with tanks, and it worked out, personally i see no issue with it. It only gave a benefit to 17th.

 

[roach3]

It was Sven who fired it we planned it all day because we knew you’d all rush that gate with tanks, and it worked out, personally i see no issue with it. It only gave a benefit to 17th.

you himarsed your own base

 

[Artemis]

you himarsed your own base

And? its in the games lore That We Nuke our bases after losing base raids to Keep info out of hands Hell we used to have a functional b2 in base that could be activate by grm why wouldnt we himars to try and scorched earth and take every last one of you down with us

 

[roach3]

im scudding the CC next time nato gets a base raid

 

[Artemis]

im scudding the CC next time nato gets a base raid

So never

 

[Aleem Abdul]

Just remove the rule that allows a team to fire from within signs / base, horrific change which was completely unnecessary and has literally 0 counter (no md’s do not count you cannot stop them from launching and there is literally 0 counter to a triple himars / scud)

At the very very very least the rule should be changed to be ‘Himars / Scud can be fired from within signs when the opposing team owns every territory’ because currently its so unnecessary specific and needless, himars / scuds method of firing was never an issue previously and it shouldnt be changed, also its never been allowed to scud / himars your own base so i have no idea how it could of happened today

 

[fyzar]

another ussr cope suggestion!

 

[Jeff Carson]

im scudding the CC next time nato gets a base raid

That’s just not going to work though? you’ll end up killing more of your own people then ours and your scud will already be destroyed by that point, once again the only reason it worked out is because we planned it, you are using scenarios where you aren’t actually thinking at all. It was a realistic scenario in my opinion, considering in the clip you provided you died before you entered the base and it seems like all the missiles landed outside in our signs. The T90-A that was in base also didn’t die to the Himars it died to my chieftain. Was just very low.

 

[Sven Sky]

I fired the HIMARS and made sure to fire it infront of signs so it wont hit our Base too much and end-up Spawnkilling NATO. Considering you are allowed to CAS behind signs I don't see a reason why the HIMARS should be disallowed. As you can only use it once and it can only stop one push and no more. HIMARSing or SCUDing CC or HC or generally the inside of the base would be unfair and I don't agree with that either. But outside of signs or within signs should be fine as a Base Raid is considered "We either defend, stay and repair or we loose the base and end up Nuking it" and damaging the outer wall isnt so bad, as CAS will do the same if you do it behind signs. So im giving a -Support on disallowing utilizing HIMARS/SCUD on our Signs.

 

[Nathaniel Brown]

I aint gone lie this suggestion is just pure cope and unnecessary.

You can only use the HIMARS once and it stopped your push so it seems like fair use to me. Yes, the highmars was inside of base signs but seemed well planned and not targeted on any vital base structure (e.g. CC/NHC).

(no md’s do not count you cannot stop them from launching and there is literally 0 counter to a triple himars / scud)

^ If one tank pushes through its over for those HIMARSes so I still dont see a problem Aleem sir!

 

[CORE.]

- Support
you guys won, why are you still complaining and trying to add more restrictions for your own benefit every single time on the forums?
You have been given tools to counter Those things but still find ways to complain and ban it
you Always cap a base under 10 mins and still won that base raid why does it matter?
surprised when Nato does something very fair thats clearly stated in the Rules?

pure Cope suggestion

 

[roach3]

The T90-A that was in base also didn’t die to the Himars it died to my chieftain. Was just very low.

no, the people inside died to worldspawn, like all the other tanks did in the console aka the himars. When you kill a tank it shows you killed the people in it. When you scud or himars the signs, the explosion radius is so large that it will always affect the base and multiple missiles did hit inside the base on top of the t90a and in front of it as I was driving it. It just doesn't show on the clip because he died very quickly.