Recent content by Ronin

I personally think that defensive combat is really fucking boring. Sitting in a room for 30 minutes is not fun for both sides. This would substantiate that issue a bit more than needed. Combine that with the fact that defensive combat is actively being discouraged by CT in the way of shields...

Perhaps a Bradley or LAV 6.0? Probably the Bradley however as the LAV 6.0 is a bit large. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1894369552 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2777817368 Even an LAV HQ would be nice to have for Passive RP.

The Army of the Three Prongs

My idea for their roster is this; 10 Humvees 3 - 4 LAVs 1 Tank To Balance this you could give CI access to more Anti-Tank Weapons such as RPGs in AA so CI can have an RPG & Matador. ( Or just two Matador pick ups ) Additionally to balance it against GOC you could have GOC get some extra...

An idea I had for a while was to emphasise that CI is an Insurgency and F is a Military. Give Nu-7 some extra armoured vehicles like a single tank with a 2 hour cooldown if it gets destroyed & an extra LAV or two. Perhaps a buff to the LAV's handling and damage put out but that's probably for...

Guys.. Do not let the UNGOC use any bombs at all!!! MC&D are NOT allowed to use their Containment Beams in site! CI can't use Juggs in Foundation Foundation can't use their disguise cards on surface! Surely limiting all equipment behind rules instead of allowing for actually cool RP...

SOP Having FUN?!?! IN THIS ECONOMY? +Support

Hiya. The Warnings bit isn't working and keeps sending me to the default Imgur page, Mind tossing over a link that works :)

They seem to be able to turn on and off the Dev Server Seemingly at will. So I don't think my idea is outrageous. Also It can be given other uses. Let me say now that MRP has an event server and it's not at a great cost to the Network.

Hello! The Events that the Server Would be used for would be few and far between, The Map Change Events would be the exception and not the rule.

Any other ideas, arguments or opinions about this would be lovely.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion calls for the adding of an event server. It would have player cap set around 40 - 80 and could only be used with Event Team Leadership Permission ( for the server they are on ). This server could be duel use as both a Content Team...

GOC = Air Superiority/Power-Projection CI = Guerrilla Warfare/Strike-Tactics SOP = Armoured Warfare/Defence in Depth This is how Surface should be balanced. Instead? It is like this. GOC = Air Superiority/Armoured-Warfare CI = Mass-Assault/Strike-Tactics SOP = Guerrilla Warfare/Defence in...

-Support GOC don't need anymore buffs.