-support
to be honest ive not really heard of this happening before. but if foundation are now allowed to bomb the shit out of SCPs in their own facility for fun with RPGs, i dont see why 035 cant (once in a blue moon) be given one too.
>Some positives are more fun breaches, a more balanced...
-support
this just feels like more job bloat. i already think we got enough job bloat in the server to the point where several departments end up having the exact same responsibilities with a different playermodel, this definitely wouldnt help. id argue itd even be actively harmful as the...
+ support
the RPGs are just nitros but reloadable. as funny as it was to watch one guy shoot three rockets at 076 while 076 was trying to defend 035 in 7722s cell and die, it was also just really tragic. SCP players suffer enough with the atrociously long breach timers, the atrociously short...
-Support
While I understand the sentiment, I think this presents the issue of players going "Im gonna grind my way to SGT to get the containment specialist job and not do any NCO responsibilities". I think its better to see people go for NCO not for the reward but rather for passion of the...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This proposal aims to introduce a new job within the Security Department, called the Executive Protection Unit (E.P.U). The role can either be whitelisted or require an Executive Protection License (A license made for this team, may be used for other...
This submission will be in the form of a document. This lore aims to set the tone of the SCP universe that the server takes place in. This lore was made in an effort to explain why everything is the way it is-- What is ERT and why do they exist? Why are E11 and Nu7 on-site all the time? Why are...
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:156598349
Discord name:
frostbytee__
For how long have you played on CG SCP:
2 and a half years
Age:
20
In what country are you located?:
United States
Time zone:
EST
Character name(s):
Aiden Corvus
Civilian name:
N/A
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This aims to make SCP-096 more challenging and fun to play, with the following changes:
1. - Increase damage against doors: regular doors break in one hit, blast doors take less time (a few minutes). [Edit: Bulkheads should take like 10 - 30...
I think people don't like that SSL does too much and too little in all the wrong ways. Like doing too much in restricting in-character wars and dictating what in-character policies should or shouldn't be a thing, but then doing too little in terms of enforcing minges and people who dont...
I'll just speak on the SA parts cuz Im SA real quick.
1. For SA being timid against GOC, its because we literally cant be aggressive. I've asked SL and NL and they ruled that we can't stop them from coming into the Foundation because it's their gameplay loop. The most we can do is place...
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:156598349
Discord name:
frostbytee__
For how long have you played on CG SCP:
2 and a half years, almost
Age:
20
In what country are you located?:
United States
Time zone:
EST
Character name(s):
E-11 Major "Vulture" | Overseer Assistant Corvus
Civilian name:
N/A
What...
Exactly. Nukes are a much more severe option that isn't fun for the SCPs, even less so than fighting ERT would be.
This suggestion adds rules and guidelines that these players would need to follow. Abuse, loopholes, or other misuse of these guidelines would get them straight up removed from...
You know what else is overpowered? A nuke. But that's still an option given for Site Command to use. With your logic of "Well if we give Site Command this power they'll just overuse it", then why not apply that same logic to nukes? Site Command doesn't even have any guidelines that they need to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.